2026 · dir. Antoine Fuqua
The Movie
Seventeen years after his death, Michael Jackson returned to cinemas in Michael — a record-shattering box-office juggernaut, a critical disappointment, and a lightning rod for fresh controversy over what the estate chose to leave out. Here's the whole story of the film.
Why it exists
A legacy play, built to uplift
The film was driven by producer Graham King (whose Bohemian Rhapsody grossed some $900M), made with the cooperation of the Michael Jackson Estate — co-executors John Branca and John McClain are credited producers, and Michael's son Prince Jackson served as an executive producer, reportedly on set every day. John Logan (The Aviator) wrote it; Antoine Fuqua directed. Lionsgate releases it in the US, Universal internationally.
By design it is a triumph narrative: the released 127-minute cut tells the rise of the King of Pop and ends in the late-1980s Bad era — before the 1993 allegations. Nia Long described the ending as leaving the rest of his life for a possible sequel.
“Michael is a complicated person… We chose to tell the uplifting story of his triumph in the movie.”
John Logan, screenwriter — at the L.A. premiere (The Hollywood Reporter)
The cast
Who plays whom
Michael is played by his own nephew — Jermaine's son, in his film debut.
Michael's mother endorsed the casting of her grandson: “Jaafar embodies my son. It's so wonderful to see him carry on the Jackson legacy.” Reviewers widely praised his performance — though he does not do his own singing.
The numbers
A commercial juggernaut — and a critical disappointment
Michael opened on April 24, 2026 to a record-setting $97.2M domestic / $218.8M worldwide — the biggest opening weekend ever for a musical biopic, smashing Straight Outta Compton's $60.2M. It has since grossed roughly $888 million worldwide ($354M domestic / $534M international, before Japan opens June 12), making it Lionsgate's highest-grossing film of all time and putting it within reach of Bohemian Rhapsody's ~$911M record for a music biopic.
Critics did not share the enthusiasm. The film settled at about 40% on Rotten Tomatoes and 39/100 on Metacritic (“generally unfavorable”) — while audiences embraced it: an “A−” CinemaScore and a ~96–97% Rotten Tomatoes audience score. The split — praise for the lead, scorn for an authorized, conflict-free narrative — is the film's defining critical story.
The release also re-ignited the catalogue: the Number Ones compilation returned to the Billboard 200 top 10 and Thriller climbed back to No. 5 — its first top-five week since 1984 — driving Jackson's biggest streaming week ever. The soundtrack, Michael: Songs From the Motion Picture, debuted at No. 37.
“Does he ever nail the look, the voice, the electrostatic moves — and, more than that, the mixture of delicacy and steel.”
Owen Gleiberman, Variety — on Jaafar Jackson
“It's just feature-length publicity, and it plays like damage control.”
William Bibbiani, TheWrap — on the film itself
Early accolades are modest — a Golden Trailer Award (Best Sound Editing in a TV Spot) and some UK National Film Award nominations. Colman Domingo (as Joe Jackson) is seen as the film's strongest Oscar bet (Best Supporting Actor); pundits consider a nomination for Jaafar Jackson unlikely, flagging the Golden Globes as his more realistic shot.
The controversies
What was left out — and the fights behind it
The most talked-about thing about Michael is what isn't in it. Below: confirmed facts and clearly-flagged reporting.
The reshoots and the 1993 settlement clause
Director Antoine Fuqua confirmed that roughly a third of what he shot was cut, and the third act was rewritten and reshot. Per reporting first broken by Puck and corroborated by Variety, the estate's attorneys discovered — after filming wrapped — that the 1993/1994 civil settlement with accuser Jordan Chandler contained a clause barring any party from depicting or mentioning him, or the allegations, in a motion picture. The original script had used the case as its third-act centerpiece. The 22 days of reshoots (June 2025) were funded by the estate at a reported $10–15M (some outlets said far more), and the release slipped from April 2025 to October 2025 to April 2026 — driven mainly by the reshoots and post-production (the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike had earlier delayed filming).
“I shot [Michael] being stripped naked, treated like an animal, a monster” — a recreation of the 1993 Neverland raid that was ultimately deleted.
Antoine Fuqua — to The New Yorker (via Variety / Rolling Stone)
The cut Diana Ross role
Actress Kat Graham, cast as Diana Ross, confirmed her scenes were removed: “certain legal considerations affected a few scenes, including ones I filmed… these moments are no longer part of the final cut.” She did not specify the reason; whether it was tied to the Chandler-clause overhaul or a separate rights issue is reported as unconfirmed.
Timing vs. the abuse trial — and survivor backlash
The film arrived with the Robson/Safechuck civil case against Jackson's companies still unresolved (reported as “in flux,” potentially 2027). The accusers' attorney John Carpenter alleged the estate wanted the flattering biopic out first: “They want the Michael Jackson biopic to come out before the trial.” Timed to the release, James Safechuck issued a video message to survivors: “it can be triggering for survivors who have their own Michael in their lives… know that you're not alone.” Leaving Neverland director Dan Reed warned young viewers would meet a Jackson stripped of any mention of the allegations.
“Sanitized” — and the estate's conflict of interest
Because the estate co-financed and produced the film — while simultaneously defending the Robson/Safechuck suit — critics argued the rights-holder controlled how (and whether) the allegations appeared. The film addresses neither the 1993 case nor the 2005 trial. IGN wrote it “makes the King of Pop boring”; IndieWire called it “sanitized, dull.” In defense, Fuqua told The New Yorker he is not convinced Jackson did what he was accused of, citing the recorded threats of Chandler's father: “sometimes people do some nasty things for some money.”
Paris Jackson vs. the estate
The genuinely documented family conflict is in probate court. In a November 2025 filing, Michael's daughter Paris Jackson alleged she is “increasingly concerned the estate has become the vehicle for John Branca to enrich and aggrandize himself,” and questioned the costly casting of Miles Teller to play Branca. Her court filings tie Branca's failure to spot the 1993 settlement clause to the expensive reshoots. The estate called the objections “false and frivolous.” Separately, Paris publicly called the script “sugar-coated” with “a lot of inaccuracy… full-blown lies.”
The nepotism debate
Casting Michael's own nephew, with no prior acting experience, drew nepotism criticism — but it was largely defused by the reviews of his performance, which were the film's most consistent praise.
The family & the film
Who was in, who stayed out
Janet Jackson does not appear in the film — by her own choice. Sister La Toya said at the premiere: “She was asked and she kindly declined, so you have to respect her wishes.” Fuqua added that Janet is “supportive of Jaafar.”
A caution on the “feud” headlines: The widely-circulated claims that Janet “hated” an early cut or that the family is “at war” over the film trace to a single gossip newsletter citing anonymous “insiders,” with no on-the-record confirmation from Janet. We present only what is confirmed: she declined to be portrayed. The one documented family dispute is Paris Jackson's probate-court objection to the estate (above).
Among those who backed the project: Prince Jackson (executive producer), La Toya Jackson (portrayed in the film, and full of praise for Jaafar), and matriarch Katherine Jackson (who endorsed the casting). Bigi (Blanket) Jackson attended the Berlin premiere. Rebbie and Randy Jackson were not involved.
On May 21, 2026, Lionsgate announced a sequel in development. Fuqua has said enough unused footage exists to support a second film — one that would, by implication, cover the later years this one avoided.
Sources
Where this comes from
Box-office and reception figures are verified against trade trackers; claims about the reshoots, the settlement clause, and family disputes are attributed, with reported/rumored items flagged as such.
- Michael (2026 film) — Wikipedia
- Michael (2026) financials — The Numbers
- Record $97M opening — Variety
- Lionsgate's highest-grossing film ever — Deadline
- Inside the reshoots / Chandler clause — Variety
- Why the allegations aren't in the film — Rolling Stone
- Kat Graham / Diana Ross role cut — THR
- Safechuck's message to survivors — THR
- Paris Jackson vs. the estate — Billboard
- Janet “kindly declined” (La Toya) — Variety
- Critic & audience scores — Rotten Tomatoes
- First reviews (critic quotes) — Rotten Tomatoes
Independent, non-commercial project; not affiliated with the film, Lionsgate, or the Estate of Michael Jackson. Box-office totals were current as of early June 2026 and continue to change.